Matching Headings Exercise 2 – Marine Ecosystems (Answers)

28. vi  29. iv  30. ii  31. viii  32. v 33. vii  34. iii

Explanations to be updated.

28. Section A
Going by the system of elimination, we can easily see that this paragraph does not talk about any of the following: i) Plans for more marine protected areas (No plans discussed), (ii) A historical overview of one specific area (No history of one area), (iii) Why more has not been done to save marine creatures (Nothing about saving lives), (iv) What the press has missed (the last line of the paragraph ‘That’s how the media reported it’ can cause some confusion but we are not told what the press missed), (v) Where biodiversity has been shown to help (No information on biodiversity), (vii) A reason for some optimism (Neither optimism nor reason has been mentioned), (viii) Various factors other than fishing (the paragraph deals only with fishing). We are left with one option and that is, (vi) Who is currently being blamed. The paragraph talks about fishing vessels and tuna farms being blamed for the declining in fishing. Hence the answer is (vi) Who is currently being blamed 


29. Section B
This paragraph in the very first line says, “However the scientist who led the study has said that the main conclusion of his research has been buried beneath the headlines.” That offers one clue to us. As we read further, we find this line, ‘ The point that many reports failed to highlight,’ says Worm… Both these lines add up to say the answer is (iv) What the press has missed. We also note that the paragraph did not talk about (i) any plans,  (ii) historical views, (iii) conservation efforts, (v) biodiversity, (vii) optimism or (vii) factors other than fishing. By the system of elimination and confirmation, the answer is (iv) What the press has missed.

30. Section C
The first line of the paragraph reads, ‘Around 7,500 years ago, shrinking glaciers and the resulting higher water levels led to the development of what’s called the Wadden Sea, a 13,500-square-kilometre area of the North Sea.” This offers us a clue. We are talking about the past (7500 years ago) and we are talking about one specific area (Wadden Sea). Hence the answer seems to be (ii) A historical overview of one specific area. By process of elimination, we note that this paragraph does not talk about (i) any plans, (iii) conservation efforts, (v) biodiversity, (vii) optimism or (vii) factors other than fishing. Hence we conclude that the answer is (ii) A historical overview of one specific area.


31. Section D
The first line of the paragraph reads, ‘What’s interesting is that overfishing isn’t the main agent of the decline, as we might assume.’ This clearly offers us a clue to the answer. Further down the paragraph talks about other factors such as, ‘exploitation, habitat destruction and pollution.’ Very clearly after running through the process of elimination also we find that the answer is (viii) Various factors other than fishing.

32. Section E
The first line of the paragraph reads, ‘What the Science paper has demonstrated, however, is that the decline in the health of ecosystems is greater where the number of different species is low.’ The term greater te number of different species’ means biodiversity. That gives us the clue that the paragraph is taking about biodiversity. Further towards the end of the paragraph comes the line, Worm believes that, ‘to have a greater number of species makes an ecosystem more robust’. This again has talked about the importance of biodiversity. This reasoning along with the elimination process, tells us that the answer to the question is (v) Where biodiversity has been shown to help 

33. Section F
The very first line of the paragraph again offers us the clue, ‘And some positive news came from the study.’ The positive news is optimism. Throughout the paragraph, Worm talks about how some measures taken have yielded positive results. This reasoning along with the elimination process gives us the answer, (vii) A reason for some optimism 

34. Section G
This paragraph talks about marine life and efforts made to conserve it and why it falls short. These are some of the reasons given: ‘view our oceans as a limitless resource, combined with a widespread failure to make an emotional connection with most marine wildlife.’
The last lines also reinforce the same view: ‘Human nature will always draw us towards those species or habitats that are more aesthetically pleasing. That’s why there will always be support for protecting pandas and very little for worms, even though nematodes play a vital role in maintaining the health of an ecosystem.’
Hence the answer is (iii) Why more has not been done to save marine creatures 

 

 

 

SECTION 3 Questions 28-40

Read the text on the following pages and answer Questions 28-40.

Questions 28-34

The text on the following pages has seven sections, A-G.

Choose the correct heading for each section from the list of headings below.

Write the correct number, i-viii, in boxes 28-34 on your answer sheet.

List of Headings 
(i) Plans for more marine protected areas 
(ii) A historical overview of one specific area 
(iii) Why more has not been done to save marine creatures 
(iv) What the press has missed 
(v) Where biodiversity has been shown to help 
(vi) Who is currently being blamed 
(vii) A reason for some optimism 
(viii) Various factors other than fishing

28. Section A

29. Section B

30. Section C

31. Section D

32. Section E

33. Section F

34. Section G

A

For some time now, the world’s oceans and the people who fish them have been a constant source of bad environmental news: cod is effectively an endangered species of fish in some places now; every year thousands of dolphins are injured by fishing vessels, huge tuna farms are ruining the Mediterranean Sea. What is more, marine biologists recently warned that our seafood is in terminal decline. According to research published in Science last November, stocks of all the fish and shellfish that we currently eat will collapse before 2050. Or at least that’s how the media reported it.

B

However, the scientist who led the study has said that the main conclusion of his research has been buried beneath the headlines. While the danger to our seafood supply is real enough, says Boris Worm, assistant professor of marine conservation biology at Dalhousie University, Canada, there is a more serious point: that the way in which we manage the oceans is not only threatening the survival of individual species, its upsetting the delicate balance of marine communities and thus causing the collapse of entire ecosystems. Research has shown that the number of ecosystems where all higher forms of life are extinct, so-called dead zones is increasing. ‘ The point that many reports failed to highlight,’ says Worm, ‘is that we have to revolutionise the way our marine resources are run, changing the focus from stocks and quotas to biodiversity and ecosystem protection. And to do that, we must change the way the debate about our marine resources is conducted in the public domain.’

C

Around 7,500 years ago, shrinking glaciers and the resulting higher water levels led to the development of what’s called the Wadden Sea, a 13,500-square-kilometre area of the North Sea. During the first 5,000 years or so, the sea pulsated with life There was a high level of biodiversity on the seabed too, and the salt marshes and mud flats on the coast supported millions of birds. This continued until around 2,000 years ago, when human pressure began to affect it. Research has shown that some of the larger creatures disappeared more than 500 years ago. And by the late 19th century, populations of most of the other mammals and fish were severely reduced, leading to the collapse of several traditional fisheries.

D

What’s interesting is that overfishing isn’t the main agent of the decline, as we might assume. It’s due to an ongoing combination of exploitation, habitat destruction and pollution. Coastal development, for example, destroys large areas of wetlands that support a range of species. Pollution fuels a process known as eutrophication, which kills certain seagrasses. Nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus contained in human and industrial waste promote the growth of tiny phytoplankton. This over-enrichment of the sea can ultimately lead to the collapse of the entire system through oxygen starvation. Most marine ecosystems have an in-built capacity to deal with a certain amount of pollution because shellfish can absorb phytoplankton. But in many cases, these have been largely removed by fishing, so the effect of any nutrient-rich pollutants entering the system is increased. In a healthy system, coastal wetlands also act as filters, so their destruction causes even more pollution. These processes have been fairly well understood for a number of years.

E

What the Science paper has demonstrated, however, is that the decline in the health of ecosystems is greater where the number of different species is low. The population of marbled rock cod around the South Atlantic island of South Georgia, for example, still hasn’t recovered after the fishing industry caused its collapse during the 1970s. By contrast, North Sea cod has withstood very heavy fishing for hundreds of years, says Worm, and although it has declined substantially, it hasn’t yet collapsed completely. Worm believes that, ‘to have a greater number of species makes an ecosystem more robust’. His theory is backed up by evidence from experiments into how ecosystems react to change.

F

And some positive news came from the study. Worm and his colleagues were able to show that it’s possible to reverse such damage as long as there are enough species. A survey of 44 protected areas revealed increases in biodiversity and fish catches close to the reserves. Worm says, ‘We should be focusing our attention on protecting all of our marine resources at the ecosystem level, and managing levels of fishing, pollution and habitat disturbance to ensure that crucial services that maintain the health of the ecosystem continue to function.’ To anyone who knows anything about ecology, it would appear that Worm is just stating the obvious. And many protected areas on land are now managed in this way.

G

However, there has long been a tendency to view our oceans as a limitless resource, combined with a widespread failure to make an emotional connection with most marine wildlife. True, we have created a small number of marine protected areas. ‘We seem to have understood the value of protecting ecosystems in areas such as the Australian Great Barrier Reef that we consider to be particularly beautiful/ says John Shepherd, Professor of Marine Sciences at Southampton University in the UK. ‘Human nature will always draw us towards those species or habitats that are more aesthetically pleasing. That’s why there will always be support for protecting pandas and very little for worms, even though nematodes play a vital role in maintaining the health of an ecosystem.’